How much oil-market buffer is left?

(depletion.org)

52 points | by mcone 1 hour ago

6 comments

  • geoffbp 51 minutes ago
  • bix6 55 minutes ago
    Can anyone speak to the long term impacts of this? Like is gas going to remain high for years (or even worse get rationed) and I should trade in for an EV now?
    • foo12bar 3 minutes ago
      Iran has continued to fire at tankers exiting the Strait of Hormuz under U.S. Navy escort, and apparently the U.S. can't afford to do anything about it.

      The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which is an alternative route used by the Saudis, is being closed by the Houthis. The Houthis are a close partner of Iran.

      And the East-West pipeline, which was another alternative route owned by the Saudis, was blown up. They went for the pumping stations, so repairing it will take at least a month, and there is no way to repair it without it possibly being hit again anyway.

      The oil infrastructure attacks by Ukraine are mainly targeting refineries, which would normally lower oil prices, since crude oil is an input to these refineries. These attacks are increasing diesel prices, though.

      Iran is trying to break the world economy so the US packs up and leaves. Israel wants to keep the US there because the US is fighting one of their strongest enemies. Because Israel "is the US's greatest ally" (as many politicians have proclaimed over the years), they have a lot of sway as to what the US does. Not to mention, they seem to do whatever they can to derail any peace process.

      Iran knows this, and therefore wants to make sure the US experiences enough pain to never come back and try to fight them again.

      So, until the US is willing to stop, which rests heavily on when Israel is willing to stop, oil prices will remain high.

      Also, we've seen nothing yet, as the soft storage (the amount of oil that's normally floating through rhe global network) and the SPR's are all running dry. I would guess $150 oil in about a month.

    • NegativeLatency 48 minutes ago
      An e-cargo bike is a good/cheaper/additional option if your situation allows it
      • bix6 39 minutes ago
        I have an ebike and freaking love it! More for leisure / local trips though.
    • karmakurtisaani 53 minutes ago
      Get the EV. They're better anyway.
      • bix6 51 minutes ago
        Yes they’re better. But it’s very expensive to get the EV I want that would replace my current cars capabilities.
        • Rohansi 49 minutes ago
          I'm curious what specific capabilities you're referring to here.
          • bix6 47 minutes ago
            I have an outback with AT tires and I can fit my surfboards inside. I don’t want a compact. Rivian R2 is tempting but esspensive.
            • WarmWash 1 minute ago
              Lightnings are awesome trucks
            • iammiles 31 minutes ago
              I replaced my old Forester with the new Trailseeker. Stsrting price (and interest rate) is much better than the R2.

              I can slide in an 8’ board no problem when I’m too lazy to use the roof rack.

              I haven’t upgraded the wheels or tires yet but the stock ones have had no problem going up and down the old logging and forest service roads of NW Oregon and SW Washington.

              • bix6 24 minutes ago
                Thank you for the rec I’ll take a look!
            • standeven 35 minutes ago
              Used Tesla Model Y with AT tires? You can get a small lift kit for them if you want more ground clearance.
              • bix6 24 minutes ago
                Fuck Elon.
            • dalyons 38 minutes ago
              The r2 is right on the median price for new cars in the US, believe it or not. Crazy. But yeah, an Outback is still cheaper
            • medler 33 minutes ago
              Subaru dealers near me have the Trailseeker, an EV comparable to the Outback, listed around $35k
              • bix6 24 minutes ago
                Ooo nice I wrote Subie off after the Solerra flop but I’ll take a look
                • medler 20 minutes ago
                  The Solterra got a lot better in the 2026 model year. It’s not a bottom-tier EV anymore. (Disclosure: I have one)
        • Aspos 48 minutes ago
          Polestar was kicked out from the US market and is now practically giving away their vehicles. Look at their lease deals.
    • Fordec 52 minutes ago
      The main point of news I heard was that the Iran infrastructure the US destroyed, in a time where they are allowed to repair it and not just get bombed again, will take three years to repair. Oil prices don't get "cheap" again this side of 2030. Not to mention that there is a bunch of Russian infrastructure that is still on the chopping block to be destroyed by Ukraine as that war continues. Which has the same time it takes to rebuild issues.
      • bluGill 36 minutes ago
        Iran infrastructure is a non-issue, they have been heavily sanctioned for years. The issue with Iran is they are stopping everybody else in the region from exporting oil.
        • larkost 22 minutes ago
          While they have been under heavy sanctions, they have largely gotten around this, for example by trading with China (who have just said they will not abide by our "unilateral sanctions"). So their oil has still been going to service global needs, and its lack will still have an effect (as will the missing Russian oil products).

          Oddly, since the Iranians (and Russians) have been selling their oil products at a discount, they were actually having the effect of holding down the price of petroleum prior to the war. No idea about how much in real terms, but...

          • bluGill 6 minutes ago
            I wouldn't say largely, but yes the sanctions were never absolute. Enough to make Iran alone not a big issue.
        • lordgilman 34 minutes ago
          There is a global market for energy, a country X that would have bought from Iran but couldn't because of refinery damage has to buy it from someone else, pushing up the price at the margin for everyone.
        • kabes 33 minutes ago
          Iran was still selling oil to China and others. Those now have to buy somewhere else, so it does affect our prices.
        • Ajedi32 30 minutes ago
          That's the main issue, yes. But where was all that oil Iran was producing going before their infrastructure was destroyed? Are you claiming they only ever used it domestically and didn't export any of it? That seems unlikely.
        • perks_12 34 minutes ago
          Iran still exported, and the nations that bought will now buy where we buy as well.
      • toyg 34 minutes ago
        And it's not just Iran now: Saudi pipelines and facilities are being hit too.

        The longer this stupid war continues, the worse off everyone will get (well, except oil executives and shareholders, I guess).

      • bix6 48 minutes ago
        Is that the timeline in general for any repairs in the region? 3 years?
      • XorNot 27 minutes ago
        Russian infrastructure isn't affecting oil prices.

        The Russians are losing refineries, not oil fields.

        The Russian crude trade to countries like India pushes the price down globally, but limits Russian access to refined fuels and products.

        It also limits their ability to fund the war.

        • bryanlarsen 13 minutes ago
          Russian infrastructure losses are affecting global diesel prices, pushing up the cost of everything.
    • lstodd 51 minutes ago
      Long term impact of Iran war is that they expand UAE-Oman pipelines to bypass Hormuz.
      • Ajedi32 10 minutes ago
        And/or ramp up production in other countries not dependent on the strait. One way or the other the market will eventually react to stabilize prices, it just takes a while (years) for the infrastructure necessary to do that to be built.
      • bix6 50 minutes ago
        And Iran can’t hit those? What’s the timeline to build?
        • Jtsummers 34 minutes ago
          Iran can hit any pipeline on the peninsula if they have an accurate enough weapon (or get lucky) and it's not shot down. Their weapon ranges covers the entire Arabian Peninsula.
        • oblio 31 minutes ago
          Iran can hit them.
    • bluGill 38 minutes ago
      No. That would require knowing the future.

      Trump supporters will tell you not to worry as he has a deal that almost done and oil will once again be cheap soon. (I didn't look up what he is saying, but he typically says things like that).

      There are a number of pessimists that will tell you that things will never get better. Or maybe they get better for a short time but peak oil is here and things will get worse again soon.

      My guess: Iran has every incentive to keep oil prices high in the US until after the election in November as the Democrats are yelling that much of high gas prices are caused by Trump attacking Iran; the higher fuel prices are the more likely it is Trump supporters in Congress lose their reelection bid and in turn hurt Trump. However I can't predict what happens after this - there are a lot of different force in the world (Both Iran and other countries) that are hurting and nobody know who will "blink" or "do something"; much less what what actions will be taken as a result.

      If you can charge at home then trading in for an EV makes sense. Electric at home is vastly cheaper than fuel. If you can't charge at home, electric prices are all over, generally cheaper, but often not by enough to be worth the bother.

      Better yet, demand your town put in good public transit. Good transit is expensive in the short run, but a good network means almost everybody in the city sells one car (most people live in a family situation with multiple cars so selling leaves one for whatever their objection is).

      • rootusrootus 30 minutes ago
        I think the future of gas prices looks ... interesting. In the short term we have the war jacking the price up, but in the medium term the increasing popularity of EVs pushes down demand and along with it prices. For a time. Until we start permanently turning off capacity, at which point prices start going back up again. I'm obviously no expert, but I envision the process of going ICE->EV being a series of waves, ebb & flow, as fuel prices react.
        • Ajedi32 13 minutes ago
          Unlike wars, EV adoption is a slow, steady, relatively predictable process. I don't think it'll have a very noticeable impact on gas prices the way short term crisis tend to.

          The much more noticeable factor will be reducing how many people even care about gas prices in the first place.

  • formerly_proven 58 minutes ago
    The real question is how quickly demand can be destroyed.
    • danans 33 minutes ago
      I'd rather we ask how quickly demand can be transferred to other energy sources, like electricity.
    • manofmanysmiles 55 minutes ago
      I am hesitant to ask, and yet morbidly curious what you are gesturing at.
      • positr0n 46 minutes ago
        Simple not morbid at all example is me buying an EV instead of a gas car and leaving the heat at 68 instead of 70 this winter destroys some demand for oil.
      • seanmcdirmid 44 minutes ago
        I'm guessing China? China has shown the world that it can tolerate the shock, and it was even a huge boon for them as they are successfully exporting excess EV production. World demand is significant, China alone was expected to increase world oil demand to a breaking point, and that isn't happening, and in fact, China is exporting oil demand destruction.
      • Retric 43 minutes ago
        EV adoption removes demand for oil as does replacing home heating oil with heat pump etc.

        Many uses for oil are based on existing infrastructure, build different infrastructure and demand falls.

      • daedrdev 36 minutes ago
        Oil prices will increase until enough people stop buying it that the decrease production is canceled out.
      • Projectiboga 35 minutes ago
        We as a planet were approaching Peak Oil consumption and this mishap has just acclerated that slightly. In all likelyhood annual oil consumtion will slowly decline or maybe quickly.
  • anovikov 1 hour ago
    But for the US, there's no question like that. It produces a lot lot more than it consumes anyway. There can't be a shortage.

    Yes US produces mostly light crude and production of refined products requires also inputs of heavy one, but it's not produced in the Middle East anyway, so current situation can't impact that, either.

    • ncallaway 53 minutes ago
      > But for the US, there's no question like that. It produces a lot lot more than it consumes anyway. There can't be a shortage.

      It's a global commodity. The reason there likely won't be a shortage in the U.S. has little to do with our production volumes, and has more to do with the fact that we're rich enough to be able to afford the higher prices when many other countries will have to forgeo using oil.

      But if we weren't a rich country and we couldn't afford to pay a higher price for oil than many other nations on earth, we would produce and export oil to people that can pay more.

      Ireland during the famine produced enough food to feed every person. But much of it was exported to other places, that could afford to pay a higher dollar amount to survive.

      • oblio 21 minutes ago
        You're 90% of the way there.

        The US is also sovereign and if things would become really bad the government would just ban exports.

        Ireland wasn't sovereign and it turns out, as much as other countries act brotherly (not that the UK really did), nobody really cares about you like you care.

    • Retric 1 hour ago
      Global trade means domestic prices move even when you’re a next exporter of a commodity.
    • soperj 1 hour ago
      Why would any producer in the US sell it locally if they could get more by shipping it?
      • Aspos 53 minutes ago
        The real question then is how quickly export ban can be implemented?
        • daedrdev 35 minutes ago
          Oil is not a single good. Different types of crude produce different products at various grades hence why diesel is so expensive in the US compared to something like natural gas
        • larkost 15 minutes ago
          Why do you think Republicans would institute an export ban? Trump has been touting every export deal he can (especially promises to purchase petroleum), he has even been measuring import/export levels as if foreign countries are cheating the U.S. if they export more to the U.S. than they import from it.

          I am not confident that the Democrats would even implement such a ban, as they get pretty big campaign donations from the oil industry as well.

        • 361994752 38 minutes ago
          Since oil companies will make good money from the price hike and exports, I guess they’ll lobby against an export ban?
    • pipodeclown 31 minutes ago
      Demand is genrally destroyed in places where people can't afford the higher oil price which is most definately not the US. Poor countries are ehere people will suffer.
    • buildsjets 46 minutes ago
      You claim there can't be a shortage, yet the rationing has already started.

      https://www.newsweek.com/costco-starts-rationing-motor-oil-w...

      • instagib 33 minutes ago
        Alfano said. “Additional Group III production is being built in the U.S., but it won’t be ready until the end of next year.”

        Costco is the only one rationing right now.

    • beloch 29 minutes ago
      There absolutely can be a price shock that will make current prices look economical. Oil is priced on a global market, and if the price is high enough, that might mean many Americans are priced out of some of their own oil. The only way to decouple the domestic and international markets is export and price controls. One need only look to Canada's NEP of the 80's to understand how that's likely to turn out.

      Also, the U.S. is currently prosecuting a trade war against Canada that has, thanks to Trump, become a question of sovereignty for Canadians. The U.S.'s largest source of foreign oil is, potentially, one outburst from Trump away from Canada placing export duties on oil. It has been discussed in Canada, and it's viewed as an extreme option, but an option nonetheless. Trump would have to say or do something truly outrageous for that to happen, but his ability to turn allies into enemies should not be underestimated.

      Bottom line, fuel could become a lot more expensive, quickly. Even if there's still gasoline to be had, it still qualifies as a shortage if it becomes unaffordable. Fuel prices affect food production, delivery of goods to markets, and pretty much every aspect of the economy.

      Oil tankers travel at about the speed of a bicyle. If a price shock does happen it will last for months. If the war with Iran is not resolved promptly, this is precisely what will happen.

    • sssilver 37 minutes ago
      Can't the US producers sell oil outside of the United States, where it's more expensive, thus generating more profits for their shareholders, thus creating a shortage in the United States, thus dragging the prices up to the global equilibrium, thus dissipating any effects of the US producing more oil than it consumes?
    • laweijfmvo 47 minutes ago
      How about the “deal” with Venezuela? When will that impact anything, if ever?
      • AnimalMuppet 14 minutes ago
        I think I heard 3 years at a minimum (don't take that number as gospel, but the order of magnitude is roughly right as a best case). The issue is that Venezuela's oil infrastructure is basically trashed by decades of neglect and mismanagement. It's going to have to be rebuilt, which is billions of dollars and several years.

        That's the best case. Worst case (for Venezuelan oil) is that the Republicans lose the House and Senate in November, then the new Congress starts investigating the Venezuela deal, and court cases start flying, and oil companies back out, and the date for the impact of the deal becomes "never".

    • Boxxed 55 minutes ago
      > It produces a lot lot more than it consumes anyway. There can't be a shortage.

      Clearly you haven't been paying attention to oil and gas prices

  • grebc 43 minutes ago
    They should be banning all the financial only/paper traders. If you can’t take delivery you can’t trade.
    • pipodeclown 34 minutes ago
      That really makes absolutely no sense. Derivatives whole purpose is to allow people to hedge their exposure to the underlying, in this case oil prices. Many parties active on these markets have such exposure but are unable or unwilling to take delivery as part of that hedging contract..
    • bluGill 33 minutes ago
      The people who take delivery hate that. They want someone else to pay for the oil that isn't in their possession yet. There is a lot of money worth of oil sitting in transport and the people who trade oil are the only ones who want that much money sitting around. (often people play the same market, but they like the separation anyway)
    • xboxnolifes 41 minutes ago
      Why?
      • AnimalMuppet 13 minutes ago
        I think the idea is that oil is expensive primarily because of speculators. That seems nuts to me. Oil might (just hypothetically) be expensive due to some kind of supply-demand imbalance.