Global Trade and the United States Navy

(acoup.blog)

18 points | by Pwntheon 2 days ago

4 comments

  • derf_ 2 hours ago
    Sarah C. M. Paine has an excellent series of lectures on what it means to be a "continental" vs. a "maritime" power, and how the latter build wealth through trade and an international rules-based order. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9VSg4ZSwJs is probably the most succinct, and a good introduction if the name Alfred T. Mahan is not familiar to you. Dwarkesh Patel's channel has a more recent 9-part series (on this and other topics): https://www.youtube.com/@DwarkeshPatel
  • Havoc 2 hours ago
    Trade will muddle through somehow. Where there is a buck to be made people can be innovative and bold.

    What worries me far more is environmental disasters. Large parts of insurance and accountability has disappeared with the arrival of the shadow fleet model.

    Only a matter of time before some pristine coastline gets fucked by an oil spill and everyone just shrugs and ignores it

  • abstractspoon 2 days ago
    Global trade or just US trade?
  • msandford 2 hours ago
    Seems like it was written by AI, the Navy is "load bearing" in the first paragraph
    • senorrib 1 hour ago
      You know "load bearing" as an expression existed before AI, right?
      • msandford 1 hour ago
        You know that the usage has gone up something around 1000x since AI right?

        Nobody outside of actual engineering or engineering adjacent like construction used load bearing up until about 6-12mo ago. Now it's everywhere.